Collaborative Divorce vs. Divorce Litigation in Chicago: What’s the Difference? Learn About Three Key Differences and Make the Right Choice for You
If you are considering divorcing your spouse in Chicago, you are likely facing a number of difficult decisions. One of the most important decisions that you likely will make, and that will shape the course of your Chicago divorce, is how you and your spouse will resolve your legal separation: through collaborative divorce or traditional litigation. The truth of the matter is that each path has its pros and cons, and understanding the key differences between each process can help you make the right choice for your situation. To help individuals in Chicago better understand the Chicago divorce process, we discuss three key differences between collaborative divorce and divorce litigation and where to find legal help with your divorce in Chicago.
Key Difference #1: Conflict vs. Cooperation in Your Chicago Divorce
As most individuals and those seeking divorce in Chicago know, divorce litigation is typically adversarial. Each party hires an attorney to advocate for their best interests, and disputes are resolved through motions, court appearances, and potentially a trial. This process can be emotionally taxing, as it often fuels conflict, especially in high-stakes matters like child custody or asset division. On the other hand, collaborative divorce emphasizes cooperation and mutual respect. Both spouses retain specially trained collaborative attorneys and agree in writing not to go to court. The parties and their attorneys work as a team, often with neutral professionals like financial advisors or child specialists, to reach a fair resolution, outside of the court process.
Key Difference #2: Controlling Privacy in Your Chicago Divorce Case
Some individuals in Chicago may not be aware of the fact that in divorce litigation, your personal affairs typically become part of the public court record. Financial disclosures, parenting disputes, and even emotional outbursts may be documented during hearings. On the other hand, collaborative divorce is typically confidential. Meetings occur privately, outside the courtroom, and the couple maintains more control over the outcome. Instead of leaving decisions to a judge, spouses work together to craft agreements tailored to their unique needs.
Key Difference #3: The Time and Cost of a Chicago Divorce
There is no question that divorce litigation, especially in very controversial cases where the parties just cannot see eye-to-eye on anything, can be lengthy and expensive. On the other hand, while collaborative divorce may not necessarily be “cheap,” it can potentially be more cost-effective. This is because the focus of collaborative divorce is problem-solving, rather than fighting, and it is possible that divorcing couples can get to “yes” faster through collaborative divorce. Of course, however, both soon-to-be ex-spouses have to be committed to the process and willing to have an open mind.
Getting Legal Help in Chicago – Chicago Divorce Lawyer
If you are in the Chicago area and you need legal help with your Chicago divorce, contact the experienced Chicago divorce lawyers at the law firm Arnoux Sharma Standeford, LLC. Contact Arnoux Sharma Standeford, LLC today and speak with a lawyer now.
