However, dissipation is not always as clear as seeing a purchase from your husband at Tiffany & Co. when he has not given you jewelry since your wedding, or a receipt from a spa in another city or a gambling website. Sometimes dissipation is done in cash transactions to avoid the other spouse from being alerted of the potential dissipation.
An example of dissipation that may be unclear is the mismanagement of marital funds by way of day trading.[2] The petitioner in this appeal was awarded nearly $1 million. Another example is the intentional sabotage of a family business.[3] The petitioner of this appeal was awarded the business.
While no person wants to think their spouse would have an affair or dissipate marital assets, the reality is that it happens. Many times, the dissipation is not done with blatant disregard of being caught — such as using a joint credit card or bank account — but is rather done quietly with the hope it is not discovered.
As there is no single way that dissipation can occur, it is important to remain vigilant regarding cash withdrawals from accounts, newly opened credit card or bank accounts and unusual spending or debts. These can all be signs that one spouse is dissipating the marital estate for their own needs. Additionally, not all dissipation requires intentional action against a financial account, as an example, destruction or abandonment of property.
The attorneys at Arnoux Sharma Standeford, LLC are experienced in making claims regarding dissipation, reviewing documents for potential dissipation and recovering the most for their clients to ensure funds are not misused. If you are considering or currently undergoing a divorce, there are steps you can take to review for dissipation to protect yourself and your assets. Contact a divorce attorney at Arnoux Sharma Standeford, LLC today for assistance.
[1] See In re Marriage of O’Neill, 138 Ill.2d 487 https://casetext.com/case/in-re-marriage-of-oneill
[2] See Schneeweis v. Schneeweis , 404 Ill. Dec. 426, 55 N.E.3d 1280, 2016 Ill. App. 2d 140147 (Ill. App. Ct. 2016) https://casetext.com/case/schneeweis-v-schneeweis?
[3] See In re Marriage of Thomas , 239 Ill. App. 3d 992, 608 N.E.2d 585 (Ill. App. Ct. 1993) https://casetext.com/case/in-re-marriage-of-thomas-8?
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
By Jonathan Standeford
Jonathan Standeford is a skilled litigator whose broad legal experience offers him the dynamic perspective he wields with every client. He regularly handles matters across Illinois regarding dissolutions of marriage, parentage, asset divisions, maintenance, child support, allocation of parental responsibilities and prenuptial/postnuptial agreements.